The Betrayer: How An Undercover Unit Infiltrated The Global Drug Trade

Product Information

Letter to Clyde S. Kilby, 7 May 1959, quoted in Michael J. Christensen, C. S. Lewis on Scripture, Abingdon, 1979, Appendix A. However, Vatican II was a pastoral rather than dogmatic council, and Christopher J. Malloy (assistant professor of theology at the Constantin College of Liberal Arts at University of Dallas) states that Ludwig Ott's reference book Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma should be regarded, "... as being current on the infallible teachings of the Church taught by the extraordinary Magisterium." [99] That reference book identifies Judas Iscariot as an example of a person receiving punishment as a particular judgment. [100]

Thus, there is a school of thought within the Catholic Church that it is unknown whether Judas Iscariot is in Hell; for example, David Endres, writing in The Catholic Telegraph, cites Catechism of the Catholic Church §597 for the inability to make any determination whether Judas is in Hell. [97] However, while that section of the catechism does instruct Catholics that the personal sin of Judas is unknown but to God, that statement is within the context that the Jewish people have no collective responsibility for Jesus's death: "... the Jews should not be spoken of as rejected or accursed as if this followed from holy Scripture." [98] This seems to be defining a different doctrinal point (i.e., the relationship of Catholics with Jewish people), rather than making any sort of decision concerning Judas's particular judgment. In paintings depicting the Last Supper, Judas is occasionally depicted with a dark-colored halo (contrasting with the lighter halos of the other apostles) to signify his former status as an apostle. More commonly, however, he is the only one at the table without one. Some church stained-glass windows show him with a dark halo such as in one of the windows of the Church of St John the Baptist, Yeovil. a b Gagné, André (June 2007). "A Critical Note on the Meaning of APOPHASIS in Gospel of Judas 33:1". Laval Théologique et Philosophique. 63 (2): 377–83. doi: 10.7202/016791ar.Baum, Paull Franklin (1916). "The English Ballad of Judas Iscariot". PMLA. 31 (2): 181–89. doi: 10.2307/456954. JSTOR 456954.

Malin Åkerström (1991). Betrayal and betrayers: the sociology of treachery. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-0-88738-358-8.

Set in the East End of London and spanning over 40 years starting in the 80’s, this is a gritty family drama revolving around Maureen, her 3 kids and as time goes on their children.... In the 1977 television miniseries Jesus of Nazareth, Judas was famously portrayed by Ian McShane, in a critically acclaimed performance. He is portrayed as being torn between personal loyalty to his Rabbi and social loyalty to the Sanhedrin. Ultimately he is "seduced" into betraying Jesus by the temple scribe Zerah, the fictional character who acts as the series' lead villain. Ehrman, Bart D. (1999). Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195124743.

Phillips, John (1986). Exploring the gospel of John: an expository commentary. Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press. p. 254. ISBN 978-0-87784-567-6. Although the canonical gospels frequently disagree on the names of some of the minor apostles, [25] all four of them list Judas Iscariot as one of them. [25] [9] The Synoptic Gospels state that Jesus sent out "the twelve" (including Judas) with power over unclean spirits and with a ministry of preaching and healing: Judas clearly played an active part in this apostolic ministry alongside the other eleven. [26] However, in the Gospel of John, Judas's outlook was differentiated—many of Jesus's disciples abandoned him because of the difficulty of accepting his teachings, and Jesus asked the twelve if they would also leave him. Simon Peter spoke for the twelve: "Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life," but Jesus observed then that despite the fact that he himself had chosen the twelve, one of them (unnamed by Jesus, but identified by the narrator) was "a devil" who would betray him. [27]Nothing stands out about it. Once you have read one book of this genre they are all the same. A couple of gangsters or villains, a young pretty wife, a stereotypical east end mam, same old family drama and disputes. Malloy, Christopher (2021). False Mercy: Recent Heresies Distorting Catholic Truth. Sophia Institute Press. p.41. Toal, M.F., ed. (1958). Sunday Sermons of the Great Fathers. Vol.2: Henry Regnery Co. p.183. {{ cite book}}: CS1 maint: location ( link)

As the elite warriors of the Night Sentinels began a foray into Hell to destroy the Nekravol and cut off the Argent energy which was corrupting their civilization in service of the Maykrs, only to be scattered and trapped in Hell by the Hell priests, another plot unfolded. Commander Valen had earlier lost his son in the struggles against Hell. The Hell priest Deag Grav, in concert with the demons, began to torment Valen with visions of his son suffering a tortured existence. Chilton, Bruce; Evans, Craig A. (2002). Authenticating the activities of Jesus. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers. ISBN 978-0391041646. Archived from the original on 13 March 2017 . Retrieved 8 February 2011.This story revolves around an east-end family (of course)! Lots of scandal, lots of nitty-gritty underworld dealings, a little bit of violence and a whole lot of love. The two head women in this family, Maureen and Ethel were brilliant. Nanny Ethel was absolute gold and I laughed out loud at her vulgar outspoken ways! Maureen has two boys and a daughter but she seems to favour James her youngest lad as he's the brain box and wants him to go far in his live so when her oldest boy Tommy tries to lead him astray she lays the law down but would she be happy that Tommy involved James in hiding evidence of the lad Tommy killed. An act of betrayal creates a constellation of negative behaviours, thoughts, and feelings in both its victims and its perpetrators. The interactions are complex. The victims exhibit anger and confusion, and demand atonement from the perpetrator, who in turn may experience guilt or shame, and exhibit remorse. If, after the perpetrator has exhibited remorse or apologized, the victim continues to express anger, this may in turn cause the perpetrator to become defensive, and angry in turn. Acceptance of betrayal can be exhibited if victims forgo the demands of atonement and retribution; but is only demonstrated if the victims do not continue to demand apologies, repeatedly remind the perpetrator or perpetrators of the original act, or ceaselessly review the incident over and over again. This was book was from the ‘British Fiction’ genre and it’s a real East-End, gritty novel, full to the brim with drama! When Maureen starts to feel ill she realises it only a matter of time before she has to tell her family. She lives for her family its all shes ever wanted and always put them first even before her health.